13 NOVEMBER 2024 | OPINION
Sir Keir’s counterattacks on the Opposition are a standard Prime Ministerial way to respond to questions, but his evasions and stock “we’re fixing the mess” routine are becoming irritating. There is only so long he will be able to divert attention to the lamentable performance of the previous Government. Soon, his side will have to cope with some difficult hatchlings from what is now their brood.
There were three in his opening remarks. One was his reference to Monday’s Armistice Day event in Paris, where he and President Macron reaffirmed their “unwavering” support for Ukraine. There’s a troublesome item for Starmer to discuss in our special relationship with America, for President-Elect Trump’s son has taunted Zelensky about losing his “allowance” under the incoming US administration.
Another was COP29 on Tuesday, where Starmer raised the UK’s CO2 emission reduction target to 81% down from 1990 levels by 2035. He told the Commons his focus was on “British energy security”, although it looks like the dash towards national dysfunctionality and poverty has just thereby accelerated.
A third was Islamophobia Awareness Month. Ayoub Khan, one of five pro-Palestinian independent MPs in the House, later used this hook to press the PM on his definition of “genocide” in relation to casualties in Gaza. Sir Keir reminded him of October 2023 and said he was “well aware” of the definition, which is why he had never used that term. British foreign policy – not just Labour’s – faces a growing challenge from Muslims who take an internationalist angle; in 2017, Pew Research estimated that followers of Islam here will soar to 17 percent of the population by 2050.
The questioning began with revisiting the Chancellor’s hike in employers’ National Insurance Contributions. Christine Jardine (Lib Dem) highlighted the impact on GP services. Starmer spoke of extra money for the NHS and social care and carers’ allowances, and was grateful for the next question – a sitter from his side inviting him to attack the Opposition’s “damaging” policies on maternity pay and the minimum wage and its “dangerous” backing for fracking. Sir Keir said here was the Opposition leader’s chance to explain why she opposed Labour’s beneficence.
Kemi Badenoch came out swinging: “The Prime Minister can plant as many questions as he likes with his backbenchers, but at the end of the day, I am the one he has to face at the Dispatch Box.”
But yet again, she offered him an escape route by a question that both commented on the extra costs of his COP commitment and asked whether he would “confirm that he will keep the cap on Council Tax?”
Naturally, the PM bolted towards the first (“lower bills, energy independence and the jobs of the future”) and left the key point unaddressed. He will always slither out, Ms Badenoch – if you let him.
Nevertheless, Kemi pressed him on the latter, asking how much extra local authorities would have to raise to adjust for NIC rises and cover the social care gap in the Budget. The PM replied to this ‘knockabout’ by repeating his earlier stated figure of £600 million more for social care – had Badenoch not been listening? Yes, she had, and it was the Government that had not been listening to “the Labour-run Local Government Association”.
“It is clear that the Government have not thought through the impact of the Budget, and this is the problem with having a copy-and-paste Chancellor. Did they not realise that care homes, GP surgeries, children’s nurseries, hospices and even charities have to pay employers’ NI?”
Starmer struck back with his standard “we’ve-done-more-than-your-lot-did”, but clearly a point had been scored.
Then came the usual: badly damaged economy, £22 billion black hole, fixing the mess… “Nothing to offer but platitudes,” commented the Mongoose. The hissing is failing to deter.
Ed Davey, too, asked for “more reassurance” on the impact of NIC on GPs. The PM repeated what he had said to Jardine earlier: “We will ensure that GP practices have the resources that they need”, without clarifying the funding gap issues.
Brendan O’Hara again raised the Winter Fuel Allowance, reminding the PM how he had sympathised with pensioners two years ago, but Sir Keir struck back against the SNP’s own economic record.
Lincoln Jopp (Con) thought he’d caught Starmer on Sue Gray and the Special Envoy job: “Will he finally admit that it was an invented job on taxpayers’ money for one of his cronies?”
“It wasn’t,” came the reply – short, and short of explanation.
Once more, we see the need for Opposition speakers to polish their snake hooks.
